<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bureau of Labor Statistics Pretty Sure People Got Jobs Last Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Durable Goods: Pockets of Strength - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/comment-page-1/#comment-32629</link>
		<dc:creator>Durable Goods: Pockets of Strength - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/#comment-32629</guid>
		<description>[...] I frequently criticize the way economic data are reported (seasonally adjusted, month-to-month change) and the way they are often interpreted. In this case, it seems that both are painting a picture that is consistent with my own read - weakening but not too weak. Here is the chart of overall durables measured as the unadjusted year/year change as illustration: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I frequently criticize the way economic data are reported (seasonally adjusted, month-to-month change) and the way they are often interpreted. In this case, it seems that both are painting a picture that is consistent with my own read &#8211; weakening but not too weak. Here is the chart of overall durables measured as the unadjusted year/year change as illustration: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jobs Growth Still Looks Like its Weakening - Stock Market Beat - Our beat is the stock market. Our job is to beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/comment-page-1/#comment-7782</link>
		<dc:creator>Jobs Growth Still Looks Like its Weakening - Stock Market Beat - Our beat is the stock market. Our job is to beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/#comment-7782</guid>
		<description>[...] The thing is, 132,000 is still well within the margin of error. The charts below give a good idea of the overall trend. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The thing is, 132,000 is still well within the margin of error. The charts below give a good idea of the overall trend. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stock Market Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk About a Misleading Headline (Durable Goods Orders)</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Stock Market Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk About a Misleading Headline (Durable Goods Orders)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/03/10/bureau-of-labor-statistics-pretty-sure-people-got-jobs-last-month/#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>[...] Durable goods orders fell 2.4 percent in July New orders for U.S.-made durable goods fell a much greater-than-expected 2.4 percent in July as civilian aircraft and car orders tumbled, a government report showed on Thursday.   If any report could serve to remind us why we prefer to look at the year/year change in non-seasonally adjusted data, this one was it. The seasonal adjustments, normal volatility and uncertainty as to whether these advance reports will be adjusted dramatically, combine to make the month/month headline data next to worthless. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Durable goods orders fell 2.4 percent in July New orders for U.S.-made durable goods fell a much greater-than-expected 2.4 percent in July as civilian aircraft and car orders tumbled, a government report showed on Thursday.   If any report could serve to remind us why we prefer to look at the year/year change in non-seasonally adjusted data, this one was it. The seasonal adjustments, normal volatility and uncertainty as to whether these advance reports will be adjusted dramatically, combine to make the month/month headline data next to worthless. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

