<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dell Just Being Stubborn Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/05/24/dell-just-being-stubborn-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/05/24/dell-just-being-stubborn-now/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DELL: Giving Real Retail A Shot - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/05/24/dell-just-being-stubborn-now/comment-page-1/#comment-32611</link>
		<dc:creator>DELL: Giving Real Retail A Shot - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 15:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/05/24/dell-just-being-stubborn-now/#comment-32611</guid>
		<description>[...] One question I have had regarding DELL&#8217;s (DELL) recent slide is whether the horse that got them here has gone lame. In the past, DELL’s model was more efficient because declining prices meant that having a low inventory and no retail markup carried a large enough advantage to offset the cost of shipping the PC. Now, with the PC selling for $500 rather than $1,500 the shipping costs per unit are much higher and may actually make bulk shipments to retailers more cost effective than individual shipments to buyers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One question I have had regarding DELL&#8217;s (DELL) recent slide is whether the horse that got them here has gone lame. In the past, DELL’s model was more efficient because declining prices meant that having a low inventory and no retail markup carried a large enough advantage to offset the cost of shipping the PC. Now, with the PC selling for $500 rather than $1,500 the shipping costs per unit are much higher and may actually make bulk shipments to retailers more cost effective than individual shipments to buyers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

