<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higher E but Lower P/E Means P = ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/08/17/higher-e-but-lower-pe-means-p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/08/17/higher-e-but-lower-pe-means-p/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/08/17/higher-e-but-lower-pe-means-p/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/08/17/higher-e-but-lower-pe-means-p/#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Thought the same thing when I read Eddy&#039;s piece.  Thanks for the other perspective.  I also have to tell myself sometimes that stocks can go much, much lower on a P/E basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought the same thing when I read Eddy&#8217;s piece.  Thanks for the other perspective.  I also have to tell myself sometimes that stocks can go much, much lower on a P/E basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

