<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Break Out The Bubbly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/09/27/break-out-the-bubbly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/09/27/break-out-the-bubbly/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stock Market Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; P/E Wave Meme Meets Wall Street Journal</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/09/27/break-out-the-bubbly/comment-page-1/#comment-3784</link>
		<dc:creator>Stock Market Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; P/E Wave Meme Meets Wall Street Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/09/27/break-out-the-bubbly/#comment-3784</guid>
		<description>[...] P/E Wave Meme Meets Wall Street Journal    We have frequently expressed our belief that stock market valuations are undergoing a long-term contraction.  Although many interpret this to mean that we expect lower values (as in a decline in major benchmarks) that doesn&#8217;t have to be the case. From 1968-1982 the market traded more or less sideways because the valuations (multiples paid on earnings) declined about as fast as the earnings themselves grew. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P/E Wave Meme Meets Wall Street Journal    We have frequently expressed our belief that stock market valuations are undergoing a long-term contraction.  Although many interpret this to mean that we expect lower values (as in a decline in major benchmarks) that doesn&#8217;t have to be the case. From 1968-1982 the market traded more or less sideways because the valuations (multiples paid on earnings) declined about as fast as the earnings themselves grew. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stock Market Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Message from Durables Report: Play Defense</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/09/27/break-out-the-bubbly/comment-page-1/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>Stock Market Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Message from Durables Report: Play Defense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2006/09/27/break-out-the-bubbly/#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>[...] The market being in a celebratory mood, little attention is being paid to such gloomy news as the durable goods report, which Briefing.com describes in rather bleak terms:   August durable goods new orders dropped a disappointing 0.5%.  There was nothing in the breakdown of the data to provide contrary cheer. Every key category was soft. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The market being in a celebratory mood, little attention is being paid to such gloomy news as the durable goods report, which Briefing.com describes in rather bleak terms:   August durable goods new orders dropped a disappointing 0.5%.  There was nothing in the breakdown of the data to provide contrary cheer. Every key category was soft. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

