<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XLNX: Xilinx Joins the Dumb Financing Decision Parade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MU: Micron Can&#8217;t Take a Hint - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/comment-page-1/#comment-30932</link>
		<dc:creator>MU: Micron Can&#8217;t Take a Hint - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/#comment-30932</guid>
		<description>[...] So, in a one-two punch that almost seems designed solely to infuriate me, Micron is using complex convertible securities, which I consider to be financial sleight-of-hand, so they can keep funding the capex levels I already think are too high. Why can&#8217;t they take the hint that there are too many memory chips already, and cut their capex by $1.1 billion instead? For more information, see all articles on: Stock Market, MU This article is for entertainment purposes only and reflects the author&#039;s opinion. It is not a solicitation or advice to buy or sell any securities mentioned. Always consult a qualified advisor before making investment decisions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, in a one-two punch that almost seems designed solely to infuriate me, Micron is using complex convertible securities, which I consider to be financial sleight-of-hand, so they can keep funding the capex levels I already think are too high. Why can&#8217;t they take the hint that there are too many memory chips already, and cut their capex by $1.1 billion instead? For more information, see all articles on: Stock Market, MU This article is for entertainment purposes only and reflects the author&#8217;s opinion. It is not a solicitation or advice to buy or sell any securities mentioned. Always consult a qualified advisor before making investment decisions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACN: Accenture&#8217;s $1.5 Billion Buyback a Drop in the Bucket - Stock Market Beat - Our beat is the stock market. Our job is to beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/comment-page-1/#comment-18860</link>
		<dc:creator>ACN: Accenture&#8217;s $1.5 Billion Buyback a Drop in the Bucket - Stock Market Beat - Our beat is the stock market. Our job is to beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/#comment-18860</guid>
		<description>[...] So it would seem the company should be able to afford something more like $2 billion. But even that would cause cash to pile up further on the balance sheet, which already shows a $2.7 billion hoard against virtually no debt. And speaking of debt, maybe they should consider taking some on to recapitalize (use for share repurchases.) It seems like a reasonable value at 9x free cash flow, which by our reckoning values the company as though it will not grow - and the strong cash flow should be sufficient to support a reasonable amount of debt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So it would seem the company should be able to afford something more like $2 billion. But even that would cause cash to pile up further on the <a href="http://financial-education.com/2007/03/03/what-is-a-balance-sheet/">balance sheet</a>, which already shows a $2.7 billion hoard against virtually no debt. And speaking of debt, maybe they should consider taking some on to recapitalize (use for share repurchases.) It seems like a reasonable value at 9x <a href="http://financial-education.com/2007/08/22/computing-free-cash-flow-to-the-firm-from-the-statement-of-cash-flows/">free cash flow</a>, which by our reckoning values the company as though it will not grow &#8211; and the strong cash flow should be sufficient to support a reasonable amount of debt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/comment-page-1/#comment-18451</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/#comment-18451</guid>
		<description>Then I must be missing something - wouldn&#039;t straight debt provide a larger tax benefit and result in a more permanent share retirement - or is the whole idea not to retire shares? Cause it looks to me like the deals are done specifically to temporarily reduce dilution caused by options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then I must be missing something &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t straight debt provide a larger tax benefit and result in a more permanent share retirement &#8211; or is the whole idea not to retire shares? Cause it looks to me like the deals are done specifically to temporarily reduce dilution caused by options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Angel</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/comment-page-1/#comment-18282</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/02/28/xlnx-xilinx-joins-the-dumb-financing-decision-parade/#comment-18282</guid>
		<description>William, the number one reason these convertible bond deals are done is specifically for the tax benefit.  This latest one by Xilinx will have a tremendous tax benefit and thus be a great benefit to the shareholders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, the number one reason these convertible bond deals are done is specifically for the tax benefit.  This latest one by Xilinx will have a tremendous tax benefit and thus be a great benefit to the shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

