<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Job Growth Slowing Down Fast</title>
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/09/job-growth-slowing-down-fast/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: More Signs of a Consumer Slowdown - Stock Market Beat - Our beat is the stock market. Our job is to beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/09/job-growth-slowing-down-fast/#comment-19666</link>
		<author>More Signs of a Consumer Slowdown - Stock Market Beat - Our beat is the stock market. Our job is to beat it.</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/09/job-growth-slowing-down-fast/#comment-19666</guid>
		<description>[...] This is something of a confirmation of what we saw in the employment report last week. Things are slowing down, despite the arguments that the housing malaise wouldn&#8217;t spread. As we noted earlier today we were surprised Texas Instruments was able to tighten their guidance rather than lower it outright. A new cel phone probably isn&#8217;t a necessity for most consumers, and is an easy way to avoid some spending. What will the market reaction be if they do miss? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is something of a confirmation of what we saw in the employment report last week. Things are slowing down, despite the arguments that the housing malaise wouldn&#8217;t spread. As we noted earlier today we were surprised Texas Instruments was able to tighten their guidance rather than lower it outright. A new cel phone probably isn&#8217;t a necessity for most consumers, and is an easy way to avoid some spending. What will the market reaction be if they do miss? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/09/job-growth-slowing-down-fast/#comment-19331</link>
		<author>Trent</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/09/job-growth-slowing-down-fast/#comment-19331</guid>
		<description>I compare total employment in a given month (non-seasonally adjusted) to the same number in the same month the prior year. By subtracting last year from this year I get the change, and the percent change is based on the prior year number. 

The data are revised over time, and I use the latest available revision for all months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I compare total employment in a given month (non-seasonally adjusted) to the same number in the same month the prior year. By subtracting last year from this year I get the change, and the percent change is based on the prior year number. </p>
<p>The data are revised over time, and I use the latest available revision for all months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosario Consiglio</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/09/job-growth-slowing-down-fast/#comment-19316</link>
		<author>Rosario Consiglio</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/09/job-growth-slowing-down-fast/#comment-19316</guid>
		<description>Exactly what Bureau of Labor Statistics report is this article and graphic based on? I could not independently verify it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly what Bureau of Labor Statistics report is this article and graphic based on? I could not independently verify it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
