<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UST: Review of UST&#8217;s 10K &#8211; Company Looks Solid But Not Cheap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/12/ust-review-of-usts-10k-company-looks-solid-but-not-cheap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/12/ust-review-of-usts-10k-company-looks-solid-but-not-cheap/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UST: UST Guides Up, But Still Falls Short of Expectations - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/12/ust-review-of-usts-10k-company-looks-solid-but-not-cheap/comment-page-1/#comment-27007</link>
		<dc:creator>UST: UST Guides Up, But Still Falls Short of Expectations - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/03/12/ust-review-of-usts-10k-company-looks-solid-but-not-cheap/#comment-27007</guid>
		<description>[...] The two &#8220;opportunities&#8221; are a restructuring charge for layoffs the company expects will reduce future expenses and a possible charge related to resolution of antitrust lawsuits currently in mediation. And even though the company raised its own outlook, the new target still falls below the $3.35 level the consensus was already expecting. When we reviewed the 10K we called it a &#8220;solid company that is not especially cheap.&#8221; That type of valuation typically requires exceeding expectations to drive the stock price. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The two &#8220;opportunities&#8221; are a <a href="http://financial-education.com/2007/02/21/restructuring-charges/">restructuring</a> charge for layoffs the company expects will reduce future expenses and a possible charge related to resolution of antitrust lawsuits currently in mediation. And even though the company raised its own outlook, the new target still falls below the $3.35 level the consensus was already expecting. When we reviewed the 10K we called it a &#8220;solid company that is not especially cheap.&#8221; That type of valuation typically requires exceeding expectations to drive the stock price. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

