<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMH: Did a Data Error Mislead Us About the Extent of Semiconductor Oversupply?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/04/16/smh-did-a-data-error-mislead-us-about-the-extent-of-semiconductor-oversupply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/04/16/smh-did-a-data-error-mislead-us-about-the-extent-of-semiconductor-oversupply/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Semi Equipment Orders Virtually Flat - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/04/16/smh-did-a-data-error-mislead-us-about-the-extent-of-semiconductor-oversupply/comment-page-1/#comment-25842</link>
		<dc:creator>Semi Equipment Orders Virtually Flat - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/04/16/smh-did-a-data-error-mislead-us-about-the-extent-of-semiconductor-oversupply/#comment-25842</guid>
		<description>[...] According to Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI): North American-based manufacturers of semiconductor equipment posted $1.42 billion in orders in March 2007 (three-month average basis) and a book-to-bill ratio of 1.00 according to the March 2007 Book-to-Bill Report published today by SEMI. A book-to-bill of 1.00 means that $100 worth of orders were received for every $100 of product billed for the month.   We&#8217;ll work on the assumption that the numbers are correct this time. You can&#8217;t get much closer to flat than 2.3% year/year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI): North American-based manufacturers of semiconductor equipment posted $1.42 billion in orders in March 2007 (three-month average basis) and a book-to-bill ratio of 1.00 according to the March 2007 Book-to-Bill Report published today by SEMI. A book-to-bill of 1.00 means that $100 worth of orders were received for every $100 of product billed for the month.   We&#8217;ll work on the assumption that the numbers are correct this time. You can&#8217;t get much closer to flat than 2.3% year/year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MU: Samsung Supports Thesis That Capex Spending Will Slow - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/04/16/smh-did-a-data-error-mislead-us-about-the-extent-of-semiconductor-oversupply/comment-page-1/#comment-25340</link>
		<dc:creator>MU: Samsung Supports Thesis That Capex Spending Will Slow - Stock Market Beat - Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 04:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/04/16/smh-did-a-data-error-mislead-us-about-the-extent-of-semiconductor-oversupply/#comment-25340</guid>
		<description>[...] SMH: Did a Data Error Mislead Us About the Extent of Semiconductor Oversupply? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SMH: Did a Data Error Mislead Us About the Extent of Semiconductor Oversupply? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

