<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XLNX: Xilinx Takes it Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/06/08/xlnx-xilinx-takes-it-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/06/08/xlnx-xilinx-takes-it-back/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tech Spending Outlook: A Conference Call Roundup &#124; Stock Market Beat</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/06/08/xlnx-xilinx-takes-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-53072</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Spending Outlook: A Conference Call Roundup &#124; Stock Market Beat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/06/08/xlnx-xilinx-takes-it-back/#comment-53072</guid>
		<description>[...] case you were wondering, Xilinx (XLNX) lowered its guidance in June, then missed the lower estimate. However, they didn&#8217;t pin the blame on Cisco. On [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case you were wondering, Xilinx (XLNX) lowered its guidance in June, then missed the lower estimate. However, they didn&#8217;t pin the blame on Cisco. On [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XLNX: Xilinx Can&#8217;t Make its Own Lower Numbers &#124; Stock Market Beat</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/06/08/xlnx-xilinx-takes-it-back/comment-page-1/#comment-48695</link>
		<dc:creator>XLNX: Xilinx Can&#8217;t Make its Own Lower Numbers &#124; Stock Market Beat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/06/08/xlnx-xilinx-takes-it-back/#comment-48695</guid>
		<description>[...] net income was $84.3 million, or $0.28 per diluted share. The 1% sequential sales gain was at the low end of the guidance management gave when they admitted that the original guidance was too high. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] net income was $84.3 million, or $0.28 per diluted share. The 1% sequential sales gain was at the low end of the guidance management gave when they admitted that the original guidance was too high. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

