<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LXK: My Close Call on Lexmark</title>
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/09/lxk-my-close-call-on-lexmark/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: LXK: Lexmark Doesn&#8217;t Disappoint When it Comes to Disappointing &#124; Stock Market Beat</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/09/lxk-my-close-call-on-lexmark/#comment-49560</link>
		<author>LXK: Lexmark Doesn&#8217;t Disappoint When it Comes to Disappointing &#124; Stock Market Beat</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/09/lxk-my-close-call-on-lexmark/#comment-49560</guid>
		<description>[...] $1.208 billion, down 2 percent compared to revenue of $1.229 billion last year and in line with the recently lowered guidance. Second-quarter GAAP earnings per share were $0.67. Earnings per share for the second quarter of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] $1.208 billion, down 2 percent compared to revenue of $1.229 billion last year and in line with the recently lowered guidance. Second-quarter GAAP earnings per share were $0.67. Earnings per share for the second quarter of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
