<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMC: Is EMC Cashing in On VMWare Just in Time?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Willis</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/comment-page-1/#comment-49604</link>
		<dc:creator>John Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/#comment-49604</guid>
		<description>&gt;My prediction: eventually VMware will be open source (though &gt;not free, and still a profitable business, just more like &gt;Redhat/ MySQL/ JBOSS in terms of business model).

No doubt...:)   The thing is that when I say they have no competition I don&#039;t man functionally I mean market wise.  I agree with you on the KVM (btw, are you that D V guy on CMG?).

I also a think VMware will dominate the x86 market for at least the next two years and also increase market share in the enterprise SUN and IBM market w/their OEM/Hypervisor plans.  Along the way they will loosen up just enough to play nice with OSS to give them about another 3-5 years.  I fact they will be so far ahead they will buy their nearest competition (with the help of EMC). 

Just my thoughts!

John Willis
johnmwillis.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;My prediction: eventually VMware will be open source (though &gt;not free, and still a profitable business, just more like &gt;Redhat/ MySQL/ JBOSS in terms of business model).</p>
<p>No doubt&#8230;:)   The thing is that when I say they have no competition I don&#8217;t man functionally I mean market wise.  I agree with you on the KVM (btw, are you that D V guy on CMG?).</p>
<p>I also a think VMware will dominate the x86 market for at least the next two years and also increase market share in the enterprise SUN and IBM market w/their OEM/Hypervisor plans.  Along the way they will loosen up just enough to play nice with OSS to give them about another 3-5 years.  I fact they will be so far ahead they will buy their nearest competition (with the help of EMC). </p>
<p>Just my thoughts!</p>
<p>John Willis<br />
johnmwillis.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/comment-page-1/#comment-48202</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/#comment-48202</guid>
		<description>We investors can be an inscrutable lot sometimes. And the best product doesn&#039;t always win, so it&#039;s good to know how it may hit a speed bump. But the more conversations we have the more likely we will be able to sort everything out.

Thanks for joining the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We investors can be an inscrutable lot sometimes. And the best product doesn&#8217;t always win, so it&#8217;s good to know how it may hit a speed bump. But the more conversations we have the more likely we will be able to sort everything out.</p>
<p>Thanks for joining the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walter</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/comment-page-1/#comment-48176</link>
		<dc:creator>walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/#comment-48176</guid>
		<description>sure... btw the way, i know nothing about stocks or business. i&#039;ll admit that. but i am a tech geek who works with these things.
At the moment, VMware does not allow people to publish direct benchmarks comparing ESX to XenSource stuff (something they&#039;ve long been criticized for, and to be fair, say they will change). Anyway, we don&#039;t truly know apples-to-apples, though those of us who have both products in-house, know.
The challenging thing about virtualization is that there really is no apples-to-apples because each of the main three dominant tools don&#039;t really fit the same niche. Xen is best for all-Linux. VMware&#039;s ESX can host both Windows and Linux without anybody getting &quot;punished for being different.&quot;
Microsoft sucks at hosting Linux at all.
At the moment, VMware is simply alone an untested.
As a geek, I really want some competition in there. But for now and the foresable future (i&#039;ve seen beta&#039;s of future MSoft and Xen stuff), I see myself using VMware for two years out, though I look forward to other open source tools (KVM and QEMU)&#039;s inclusion in the Linux kernely, really creating some new options.
My prediction: eventually VMware will be open source (though not free, and still a profitable business, just more like Redhat/ MySQL/ JBOSS in terms of business model).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure&#8230; btw the way, i know nothing about stocks or business. i&#8217;ll admit that. but i am a tech geek who works with these things.<br />
At the moment, VMware does not allow people to publish direct benchmarks comparing ESX to XenSource stuff (something they&#8217;ve long been criticized for, and to be fair, say they will change). Anyway, we don&#8217;t truly know apples-to-apples, though those of us who have both products in-house, know.<br />
The challenging thing about virtualization is that there really is no apples-to-apples because each of the main three dominant tools don&#8217;t really fit the same niche. Xen is best for all-Linux. VMware&#8217;s ESX can host both Windows and Linux without anybody getting &#8220;punished for being different.&#8221;<br />
Microsoft sucks at hosting Linux at all.<br />
At the moment, VMware is simply alone an untested.<br />
As a geek, I really want some competition in there. But for now and the foresable future (i&#8217;ve seen beta&#8217;s of future MSoft and Xen stuff), I see myself using VMware for two years out, though I look forward to other open source tools (KVM and QEMU)&#8217;s inclusion in the Linux kernely, really creating some new options.<br />
My prediction: eventually VMware will be open source (though not free, and still a profitable business, just more like Redhat/ MySQL/ JBOSS in terms of business model).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/comment-page-1/#comment-48136</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/#comment-48136</guid>
		<description>Good points, and I don&#039;t profess to be as up on the competitive situation as industry insiders. However, many interested investors are not industry insiders. I think this kind of information is useful for investors to have, to decide for themselves how important it is.

Also, a reader pointed out that while Xen may charge less per socket it doesn&#039;t mean you are paying less.  Performance is a key to virtualization, and VMware outperforms every hypervisor on the market.  If a company can get 12-15 Virtual Machines with VMWare, it may only get 7-8 with competitors products.  Take in the extra hardware, cabling, power, etc...you get the point.  You must compare apples to apples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, and I don&#8217;t profess to be as up on the competitive situation as industry insiders. However, many interested investors are not industry insiders. I think this kind of information is useful for investors to have, to decide for themselves how important it is.</p>
<p>Also, a reader pointed out that while Xen may charge less per socket it doesn&#8217;t mean you are paying less.  Performance is a key to virtualization, and VMware outperforms every hypervisor on the market.  If a company can get 12-15 Virtual Machines with VMWare, it may only get 7-8 with competitors products.  Take in the extra hardware, cabling, power, etc&#8230;you get the point.  You must compare apples to apples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walter</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/comment-page-1/#comment-48112</link>
		<dc:creator>walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/#comment-48112</guid>
		<description>VMware does have its share of competitors out there. But it&#039;s not XenSource. People have been beating the drum for XenSource and the related Xen open source project for a really long time. They&#039;ve changed their model and product/ service around a million times.

I have my on *other* open source projects: Virtual Box, QEMU, and KVM. Xen(Source) has it the industry&#039;s attention for too long and just never delivered the ease of ESX&#039;s management tools.

I think VMware has a guaranteed additional two years of dominance before they need to seriously respond to these OSS competitors.  Their problem will not be Microsoft or XenSource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware does have its share of competitors out there. But it&#8217;s not XenSource. People have been beating the drum for XenSource and the related Xen open source project for a really long time. They&#8217;ve changed their model and product/ service around a million times.</p>
<p>I have my on *other* open source projects: Virtual Box, QEMU, and KVM. Xen(Source) has it the industry&#8217;s attention for too long and just never delivered the ease of ESX&#8217;s management tools.</p>
<p>I think VMware has a guaranteed additional two years of dominance before they need to seriously respond to these OSS competitors.  Their problem will not be Microsoft or XenSource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is there real competition to VMware.... Not ... &#124; John M Willis - ESM BLOG</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/comment-page-1/#comment-48045</link>
		<dc:creator>Is there real competition to VMware.... Not ... &#124; John M Willis - ESM BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2007/07/18/emc-is-emc-cashing-in-on-vmware-just-in-time/#comment-48045</guid>
		<description>[...] Is there real competition to VMware&#8230;. Not &#8230;Topic: virtualization, emc, vmware&#124;   EMC: Is EMC Cashing in On VMWare Just in Time?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is there real competition to VMware&#8230;. Not &#8230;Topic: virtualization, emc, vmware|   EMC: Is EMC Cashing in On VMWare Just in Time?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

