<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSTR: MicroStrategy Looks Cheap for a Reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2008/02/05/mstr-microstrategy-looks-cheap-for-a-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2008/02/05/mstr-microstrategy-looks-cheap-for-a-reason/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:36:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MSTR: Why Were Investors Surprised by MicroStrategy Miss? &#124; Stock Market Beat</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2008/02/05/mstr-microstrategy-looks-cheap-for-a-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-53470</link>
		<dc:creator>MSTR: Why Were Investors Surprised by MicroStrategy Miss? &#124; Stock Market Beat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2008/02/05/mstr-microstrategy-looks-cheap-for-a-reason/#comment-53470</guid>
		<description>[...] shouldn’t have been. I warned three months ago that MicroStrategy looked cheap for a reason: A look at recent customer wins shows a concentration of retail, financial and healthcare markets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shouldn’t have been. I warned three months ago that MicroStrategy looked cheap for a reason: A look at recent customer wins shows a concentration of retail, financial and healthcare markets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

