<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSTR: MicroStrategy Looks Cheap for a Reason</title>
	<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2008/02/05/mstr-microstrategy-looks-cheap-for-a-reason/</link>
	<description>Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: MSTR: Why Were Investors Surprised by MicroStrategy Miss? &#124; Stock Market Beat</title>
		<link>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2008/02/05/mstr-microstrategy-looks-cheap-for-a-reason/#comment-53470</link>
		<author>MSTR: Why Were Investors Surprised by MicroStrategy Miss? &#124; Stock Market Beat</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stockmarketbeat.com/blog1/2008/02/05/mstr-microstrategy-looks-cheap-for-a-reason/#comment-53470</guid>
		<description>[...] shouldn’t have been. I warned three months ago that MicroStrategy looked cheap for a reason: A look at recent customer wins shows a concentration of retail, financial and healthcare markets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] shouldn’t have been. I warned three months ago that MicroStrategy looked cheap for a reason: A look at recent customer wins shows a concentration of retail, financial and healthcare markets. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
