Archive: Producer Price Index

15 More Stock Tips from the U.S. Government

My latest column is up at RealMoney.

According to a release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, core producer prices increased by 0.4% in April and 3% over the last 12 months. The monthly gain was twice the rate that had been forecast, and the 12-month change was the largest gain since December 1991.

I’ll leave reading the economic tea leaves to those who are better at it. For a stock picker like me, government economic reports can do more than just indicate the state of the economy. Instead, I like to examine the industry-level data to see if there are specific industries to consider more closely as investment opportunities. As usual, this month’s PPI report did not disappoint.

Disclosure: At time of publication, William Trent has no position in the securities mentioned in this article.

Topics: Ball Corp. (BLL), Producer Price Index, Computer Hardware, Containers and Packaging, Crown Holdings (CCK), Railroad, GATX (GMT), Hain Celestial (HAIN), HJ Heinz (HNZ), Miscellaneous Transportation, Norfolk Southern (NSC), CSX Corp. (CSX), Silgan (SLGN), Apple (AAPL), Hewlett Packard (HPQ), Dell (DELL), Food Processing, Campbell Soup (CPB), Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI), Del Monte Foods (DLM), Union Pacific (UNP), Economy | 1 Comment

Semiconductor Pricing Near a Bottom?

I warned most of last year that building oversupply would harm pricing for semiconductors, and the latest PPI data bear that out.
PPI for semiconductors

Pricing is the worst it has been since late 2003, which in turn was the worst it has ever been. But I think the fundamental outlook is improving, and my updated supply and demand model shows that late 2003 was actually quite a good time to own semiconductor stocks. You can never be too sure, though, so I decided to review the recent conference calls from a broad range of semiconductor manufacturers to get their sense of market conditions.

Intel (INTC - Annual Report) is seeing a shift in where the pricing pressure is coming.

Now, as far as the pricing environment. It was a more competitive pricing environment than we thought in Q2, and we expect it to continue to be somewhat competitive which is what you’re seeing in our margin outlook for the year. We believe the best defense against the competitive price environment is better product.

If you look at what’s happening with us the last year, you’ve seen better products quarter by quarter by quarter. You’ve seen improved product differentiation, 45 nanometer coming out; the Penryn product family, as Paul talked about. So what you’re seeing is Intel’s commitment and focus to making our products better and better and better which is the best defense we have in a competitive pricing situation.

Glen Yeung - Citigroup

Andy, is the pricing pressure the same now as it has been all year? Is it getting worse or getting better?

Paul Otellini

I would say it is different, Glen. It is much more targeted now at the low end of the desktop and even a little bit of the notebook marketplace, and a year ago it was higher in the stacks in many areas.

(Excerpt from full INTC conference call transcript)

Altera (ALTR) is deciding that in some cases they just won’t take it anymore.

There are pieces of business that we do look at, that we do turn down, because we don’t think that they are profitable today or will ever be profitable pieces of business for us to entertain. As an example in Q1 we looked at two pieces of consumer business, where the pricing expectation and requirement for the customer was not something that we could support. And so, we told the customer, we were not interested in participating in the business going forward.

(Excerpt from full ALTR conference call transcript)

Texas Instruments (TXN - Annual Report) wants to avoid competition where possible.

Jim Covello - Goldman Sachs

Okay. And then maybe my final question. Just on the analog side, you guys are obviously doing a terrific job picking up share. You talked at the Analyst Meeting in very clear terms about the strategy for doing that and a lot of the share gain is kind of coming from that third bucket you described at the Analyst Meeting, the smaller customers where you have the scale and mask to you need to go after customers that maybe your competitors don’t have the same scale and mask to go after. What kind of competitive response are you expecting from the rest of the analog industry, as they try and stop you guys on your continued share gain impact? Thanks a lot.

Kevin March

Jim I guess, I would comment on that, we have already been seeing competitive response but I think the difficulty for our competitors again has to do with scale, that is we have a sales force that is such that we can just simply touch a lot more customers than any of our competitors can touch at a one point in time. We added to that the breath of our total product offering that we have and we can literally solve almost any problem that a customer may have on a particular Board that they’re may be designing, which allows them to really solve their problem fairly quickly with solutions that we have as opposed to having multiple vendors in. Those are probably two elements of the position that we enjoy today and we’ll enjoy in the future that we would expect to be quite difficult for our competitors to really be able to overcome, so we remained confident that our objectives to growing our positions in analog are really pretty solid and within our reach.

(Excerpt from full TXN conference call transcript)

All in all, it seems that management teams are seeing the competitive pressures that are reflected in the PPI, and are responding to them. Their response, I believe, will improve the industry’s fundamental balance and result in better pricing and better stock prices.

Disclosure: William Trent holds put options on the shares of Lam Research (LRCX) and has a short position in put options related to the Semiconductor HOLDRs ETF (SMH).

William Trent currently owns put options against the shares of Lam Research (LRCX).

Topics: Altera (ALTR), Producer Price Index, Maxim Integrated Products (MXIM), Texas Instruments (TXN), Intel (INTC), Semiconductors, Economy | No Comments

Refining My Knowledge of Refineries

I have frequently heard that oil inventories aren’t very important because refining capacity is the gating factor for most products. According to a recent MSNBC article:

There hasn’t been a new refinery built in the U.S. since 1976, the result of extremely tight environmental restrictions, not-in-my-back-yard community opposition, and the high cost of new construction. Used refineries currently sell for about 30 to 50 percent of the cost of building a new one, so it’s cheaper to buy an old refinery and upgrade it. Or squeeze a little more gasoline out of the refineries you already own.

Expansion of refining capacity is also made more difficult because oil refineries are a lot more complicated to build and operate than your average widget factory. For starters the raw material — crude oil — has many different properties, from thickness to sulfur content, so not all refineries can blend just any barrel of crude.

You would think that in this type of environment the refineries would be able to charge whatever they like. But recent PPI data suggests otherwise.

PPI for petroleum refineries

After a prolonged period of significant price gains, the year/year change in refinery pricing power dipped into negative territory early in the year and has been relatively flat since. Are the glory days over or is this a temporary lull? For help answering this question I turned to the recent conference calls from three of the larger companies that get most of their business from refining and marketing: Sunoco (SUN), Valero (VLO) and Holly (HOC).

First, speaking to refining margins, as we did last quarter, if you look at slides 6 to 9, we have included some detail of the realized refining margin versus our reported market benchmark for each of our geographic refining regions. Rather than walk through each slide in too much detail, let me make a few summary comments.

In the Northeast, our realized gross margin for the quarter was $12.32 a barrel, which was up about $0.75 a barrel from last year’s very strong second quarter, and was also about $0.73 a barrel better than our standard 6321 benchmark. On the input side, realized crude costs in the second quarter were $1.66 a barrel higher than our Dated Brent plus $1.25 a barrel benchmark. So still reflective of a very expensive market for light sweet crude in the Atlantic basin, but improved from the first quarter of this year….

If I can turn now to the MidContinent region, where industry downtime had a more significant market impact, our realized gross margin in the second quarter was $22.14 a barrel, up over $7 a barrel from the second quarter of last year but about $6 a barrel lower than our standard WTI based 321 benchmark. Again, on the crude side, actual crude costs were $2.17 a barrel above the WTI plus $0.75 a barrel marker, as WTI continued to be a weak relative benchmark.

Additionally, the price of Canadian syncrude, which accounts for about half of our crude slate at Toledo, traded at an increased premium to WTI during the quarter, due largely to upgrade or maintenance and other downtime among Canadian producers.

On the product side in the MidContinent, our realization was almost $4 a barrel below the benchmark. This correlation, also seen in last year’s second quarter, is fairly typical of periods when gasoline crack spreads are very strong. This is primarily because the 321 marker we use implicitly assumes that two-thirds of our MidContinent refinery production is gasoline when it actually averages more like about a half.

So let me say in summary, putting all those numbers and relationships aside, clearly second quarter refining margins were very strong by any historical measure.

(Excerpt from full SUN conference call transcript)

Paul Sankey - Deutsche Bank

Hi everyone. I think we’ve just about hit all my questions, actually, but one that’s outstanding is the way the curves have shifted. Is there any meaningful impact for you from the moves that we’ve seen to backwardation in crude markets? As a follow up, any observations you could make about the fact that crude inventories, ostensibly, are quite high in the U.S., but we’ve seen obviously very high prices. At the same time, gasoline inventory is not super loose by any means, but a cratering of the price there - any observations you can make on those would be great.

Unidentified Company Representative

Well, I’ll speak to gasoline. Gasoline pries are very low. They’re very low on a historical basis. So the decline that we’ve seen in the margins there isn’t necessarily fundamentally driven. We’re entering the season where we will start blending butanes back in, and so we know that will have an effect on the inventories. Nonetheless, we go into that period with inventories at very attractive levels relative to previous years.

On the crude, the change in the market structure just means that we’re not paid to carry it right, so what we’ll do, what we always do, is we aggressively manage the inventory to the market structure, as we’ve done on the product side.

Paul Sankey - Deutsche Bank

Right, so I’d expect to see inventories continuing to fall, but maybe the price, nevertheless, staying high.

(Excerpt from full VLO conference call transcript)

Historically high industry-wide margins, our location advantage product prices, and record production levels at our facilities fueled the best quarter in Holly’s history.

The pure gasoline and diesel prices in our markets, due to the tight supply/demand balance in our Rocky Mountain and Southwest markets, combined with lower raw material costs to create historical quarterly average gas and diesel cracks at both plants.

Higher runs at lower cost black wax crudes at Woods Cross and a widening of the discounts for sour crudes run at Navajo, compared to compressed WTI prices versus similar worldwide crudes, helped drive down our raw material costs.

Our folks ran both plants at 99%-plus utilization rate, realizing the full benefit of the 2006 midyear expansion of the Artesia refinery and enabling a virtual full capture of the great margin environment experienced during the second quarter….

Although, as in other markets, our margins have reduced substantially in July and August from the lofty levels experienced during the second quarter, we remain extremely bullish on the refining industry fundamentals.

(Excerpt from full HOC conference call transcript)

Now I’m no energy expert, but it sounds to me like there is very little wrong with refining industry fundamentals. If anyone out there can enlighten me, please do so.

Topics: Sunoco (SUN), Holly (HOC), Producer Price Index, Valero Energy (VLO), Stock Market, Vaalco Energy (EGY), Economy | 2 Comments

Performance Review - Week of 21 July 2007

My watch lists did not perform as well as the benchmarks this week. The Small Cap Watch List (Track at Marketocracy) lost 2.54%, compared with losses of 2.25% for the Russell 2000 and 1.59% for the S&P Small Cap 600.

smallcap

The Mid Cap Watch List (Track at Marketocracy) lost 1.96%, compared with 1.32% for the S&P Midcap 400.

midcap

The Large Cap Watch List (Track at Marketocracy) lost 1.43% while the S&P 500 lost just 1.19%. At least it is still doing better since inception.

largecap

The economic data last week continued the prior trend - mixed with a skew to the weak side.

EconomicData

Bad and Deteriorating Bad but Improving Good but Deteriorating Good and Improving
Existing Homes (June) Chicago Fed NAI (May) Consumer Confidence (June) Real Disposable Income
Employment (June) Durable Goods (June) Personal Spending (June) ISM Manufacturing (July)
New Home Sales (June) Construction Spending Retail sales (August 2007) ISM Services (June)
ATA Truck Tonnage (June) CPI (July 07) Leading Indicators (June)  
GDP (Q2 Advance) Trade deficit (July 07)    
PPI (July 07) Durable Goods (July)    
Industrial Production (July 07)      
Housing Starts (July 07)      
       
       

Topics: Small Cap Watch List, Mid Cap Watch List, Large Cap Watch List, Producer Price Index, Durable Goods, S&P Smallcap 600 (SML), S&P 500 (SPY), Watch List, Russell 2000 (RUT), S&P Midcap (MID), Economy | No Comments

SLGN: Silgan Does the Pricing Power Can-Can

Small Cap Watch List (Track at Marketocracy) member Silgan Holdings (SLGN - Annual Report) says in their latest 10K:

We are the largest manufacturer of metal food containers in North America, with a unit volume market share for the year ended December 31, 2006 of approximately half of the market in the United States, a leading manufacturer of plastic containers in North America for a variety of markets, including the personal care, health care, household and industrial chemical and pet care markets, and a leading worldwide manufacturer of metal, composite and plastic vacuum closures for food and beverage products.

It is often nice to find a small cap company with a dominant market share in its niche. It is even nicer when that niche is doing well. Today’s PPI report shows that the recent trend of strong pricing power in the canning industry continues. In fact, the chart is rather impressive.

PPI Pricing Power for Fruit and Vegetable Canning

Not only is pricing power near the high end of the 10-year range, it is in a general rising trend. The only concern is whether that bend at the end is just a bend or whether it is the start of a new trend. Whatever the case, though, this chart bodes well for Silgan’s earnings report tomorrow.

This trend should also be good for Silgan’s competitors, which include Ball Corporation (BLL), Crown Holdings CCK - Annual Report), Rexam (REXMY) and Constar International (CNST).

Topics: Constar International (CNST), Ball Corp. (BLL), Crown Holdings (CCK), Rexam (REXMY), Producer Price Index, Basic Materials, Silgan (SLGN), Containers and Packaging, Economy | No Comments