Archive: Valero Energy (VLO)

26 Stock Tips from the US Government

My latest column is up at RealMoney. Here is a summary:

Government economic reports can do more than just indicate the state of the economy. Since many of the reports include industry-level data, digging deeper in the reports can help investors find specific industries to consider more closely. For example, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which prepares the PPI report, provides detailed information on an industry basis.

Since I wrote about the PPI data in September, the pricing power has shifted to some different industries. Therefore, I thought an update would be in order.

Some of the industries that look interesting are petroleum refineries, industrial gases, computers, computer storage devices, and line-haul railroads.

Disclosure: At time of publication, William Trent has no financial position in the companies mentioned.

Topics: Computer Storage Devices, EMC Corp. (EMC), Computer Hardware, Oil and Gas Operations, WDC, Railroad, Sunoco (SUN), Hutchinson (HTCH), Quantum (QTM), Iomega (IOM), Seagate (STX), Holly (HOC), Norfolk Southern (NSC), CSX Corp. (CSX), Praxair (PX), Air Products (APD), Apple (AAPL), Hewlett Packard (HPQ), Dell (DELL), Union Pacific (UNP), Tesoro (TSO), Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI), Valero Energy (VLO), Brocade (BRCD), Sandisk (SNDK), Frontier Oil (FTO), Transportation | No Comments

FTO: Forces Aligning for Frontier


Creative Commons License photo credit: Gastev

This article is a reprint of my February 19, 2008 RealMoney column

After peaking above $49 per share last year, refiner Frontier Oil (FTO) sunk to intraday lows in the $20’s last month before starting a rally on the news of Valero’s (VLO) positive outlook on the latest conference call. My biggest surprise, looking over the data for Frontier and the industry, is why it hasn’t rallied even more.

First of all, Valero indicated that “Current industry conditions are setting the stage for rebounding gasoline margins.” If true, that would be equally positive for Frontier and others. Not that I don’t believe Valero, but I thought a check of the PPI industry statistics could provide an unbiased second opinion.

Petroleum Refineries PPI, 12-Months Percent Change

refinery-ppi.gif

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Lo and behold, year/year price increases for petroleum refineries have suddenly shot straight up. If that doesn’t set the stage for rebounding margins, what will?

Hardly a week later, there was actually speculation that Valero would buy Frontier. However, according to the Reuters article, Fadel Gheit, an oil analyst with Oppenheimer & Co, also questioned the rationale behind Valero buying Frontier, especially since Valero has already sold one refinery and has said it would sell two and maybe three others.

Sold a refinery, you say? That sounds like a ripe opportunity for a comparables analysis to see how Frontier’s valuation stacks up against an arms-length transaction between industry experts. And at first glance, Frontier doesn’t come out looking so hot.

Valero’s Lima, Ohio refinery was sold last year to Canada’s Husky Energy (HSE.TO) for $2.1 billion. Lima’s 165,000 barrel per day stated capacity being quite close to Frontier’s total capacity of 162,000 barrels per day, the comparison initially looks valid. And with Frontier’s enterprise value at $3.6 billion, the implications could be that Valero’s management got ripped off, Frontier is overvalued, or the assets aren’t really comparable.

Valero is a good company, and I don’t believe its experienced managers got ripped off. The other two theses can be tested by comparing the assets. According to Husky’s road show slides, it seems Lima was something of a fixer-upper. Running well below the stated throughput, its sales and profitability were not close to those of Frontier. Taking the 2006 performance as an example, I was able to compare the valuation relative to various fundamental metrics.

Metrics

 

Valuation

Frontier Lima Frontier Lima
Stated throughput         162          165        21.7        12.7
Throughput         172          136        20.4        15.4
Sales       4,759       4,119          0.7          0.5
EBITDA         615          327          5.7          6.4
EBIT         574          288          6.1          7.3
Value       3,510       2,100

Sources: Company filings, compiled by William A. Trent

Although Frontier looks more expensive on the basis of throughput or sales, its full-throttle capacity utilization has resulted in a far more efficient operation. As a result, Frontier is cheaper based on EBIT or EBITDA, which are the valuation measures most frequently used in the industry.

Of course, running at full capacity also means there is little room for further improvement other than through the commodity prices themselves. Even considering a fair valuation, that could mean there is significantly more downside risk than potential upside.

I also looked at Frontier on the basis of my favored valuation tool, its free cash flow yield. In this regard, Frontier’s yield on trailing free cash flow is about 6.2%, which is sufficiently above the yield on five-year Treasuries that I don’t need significant growth to justify a purchase. The potential rebounding margins, in other words, is a bonus.

Disclosures: None

Disclosure: Author is long UNITED STS OIL FD LP UNITS (USO) at time of publication.

Topics: Husky Energy (HSE.TO), Oil and Gas Operations, Valero Energy (VLO), Frontier Oil (FTO) | No Comments

Refining My Knowledge of Refineries

I have frequently heard that oil inventories aren’t very important because refining capacity is the gating factor for most products. According to a recent MSNBC article:

There hasn’t been a new refinery built in the U.S. since 1976, the result of extremely tight environmental restrictions, not-in-my-back-yard community opposition, and the high cost of new construction. Used refineries currently sell for about 30 to 50 percent of the cost of building a new one, so it’s cheaper to buy an old refinery and upgrade it. Or squeeze a little more gasoline out of the refineries you already own.

Expansion of refining capacity is also made more difficult because oil refineries are a lot more complicated to build and operate than your average widget factory. For starters the raw material — crude oil — has many different properties, from thickness to sulfur content, so not all refineries can blend just any barrel of crude.

You would think that in this type of environment the refineries would be able to charge whatever they like. But recent PPI data suggests otherwise.

PPI for petroleum refineries

After a prolonged period of significant price gains, the year/year change in refinery pricing power dipped into negative territory early in the year and has been relatively flat since. Are the glory days over or is this a temporary lull? For help answering this question I turned to the recent conference calls from three of the larger companies that get most of their business from refining and marketing: Sunoco (SUN), Valero (VLO) and Holly (HOC).

First, speaking to refining margins, as we did last quarter, if you look at slides 6 to 9, we have included some detail of the realized refining margin versus our reported market benchmark for each of our geographic refining regions. Rather than walk through each slide in too much detail, let me make a few summary comments.

In the Northeast, our realized gross margin for the quarter was $12.32 a barrel, which was up about $0.75 a barrel from last year’s very strong second quarter, and was also about $0.73 a barrel better than our standard 6321 benchmark. On the input side, realized crude costs in the second quarter were $1.66 a barrel higher than our Dated Brent plus $1.25 a barrel benchmark. So still reflective of a very expensive market for light sweet crude in the Atlantic basin, but improved from the first quarter of this year….

If I can turn now to the MidContinent region, where industry downtime had a more significant market impact, our realized gross margin in the second quarter was $22.14 a barrel, up over $7 a barrel from the second quarter of last year but about $6 a barrel lower than our standard WTI based 321 benchmark. Again, on the crude side, actual crude costs were $2.17 a barrel above the WTI plus $0.75 a barrel marker, as WTI continued to be a weak relative benchmark.

Additionally, the price of Canadian syncrude, which accounts for about half of our crude slate at Toledo, traded at an increased premium to WTI during the quarter, due largely to upgrade or maintenance and other downtime among Canadian producers.

On the product side in the MidContinent, our realization was almost $4 a barrel below the benchmark. This correlation, also seen in last year’s second quarter, is fairly typical of periods when gasoline crack spreads are very strong. This is primarily because the 321 marker we use implicitly assumes that two-thirds of our MidContinent refinery production is gasoline when it actually averages more like about a half.

So let me say in summary, putting all those numbers and relationships aside, clearly second quarter refining margins were very strong by any historical measure.

(Excerpt from full SUN conference call transcript)

Paul Sankey - Deutsche Bank

Hi everyone. I think we’ve just about hit all my questions, actually, but one that’s outstanding is the way the curves have shifted. Is there any meaningful impact for you from the moves that we’ve seen to backwardation in crude markets? As a follow up, any observations you could make about the fact that crude inventories, ostensibly, are quite high in the U.S., but we’ve seen obviously very high prices. At the same time, gasoline inventory is not super loose by any means, but a cratering of the price there - any observations you can make on those would be great.

Unidentified Company Representative

Well, I’ll speak to gasoline. Gasoline pries are very low. They’re very low on a historical basis. So the decline that we’ve seen in the margins there isn’t necessarily fundamentally driven. We’re entering the season where we will start blending butanes back in, and so we know that will have an effect on the inventories. Nonetheless, we go into that period with inventories at very attractive levels relative to previous years.

On the crude, the change in the market structure just means that we’re not paid to carry it right, so what we’ll do, what we always do, is we aggressively manage the inventory to the market structure, as we’ve done on the product side.

Paul Sankey - Deutsche Bank

Right, so I’d expect to see inventories continuing to fall, but maybe the price, nevertheless, staying high.

(Excerpt from full VLO conference call transcript)

Historically high industry-wide margins, our location advantage product prices, and record production levels at our facilities fueled the best quarter in Holly’s history.

The pure gasoline and diesel prices in our markets, due to the tight supply/demand balance in our Rocky Mountain and Southwest markets, combined with lower raw material costs to create historical quarterly average gas and diesel cracks at both plants.

Higher runs at lower cost black wax crudes at Woods Cross and a widening of the discounts for sour crudes run at Navajo, compared to compressed WTI prices versus similar worldwide crudes, helped drive down our raw material costs.

Our folks ran both plants at 99%-plus utilization rate, realizing the full benefit of the 2006 midyear expansion of the Artesia refinery and enabling a virtual full capture of the great margin environment experienced during the second quarter….

Although, as in other markets, our margins have reduced substantially in July and August from the lofty levels experienced during the second quarter, we remain extremely bullish on the refining industry fundamentals.

(Excerpt from full HOC conference call transcript)

Now I’m no energy expert, but it sounds to me like there is very little wrong with refining industry fundamentals. If anyone out there can enlighten me, please do so.

Disclosure: Author is long UNITED STS OIL FD LP UNITS (USO) at time of publication.

Topics: Sunoco (SUN), Holly (HOC), Producer Price Index, Valero Energy (VLO), Stock Market, Vaalco Energy (EGY), Economy | 2 Comments

PPI: Who Has the Pricing Power?

Producer prices up 0.9 pct in May - Yahoo! News

Overall producer prices, which are a measure of prices before they reach the consumer, rose 4.1 percent from a year ago, the biggest year-over-year increase since June 2006. However, core producer prices were up just 1.6 percent from a year ago, and that moderate gain will likely add some relief to Federal Reserve policy-makers as they balance the risks of inflation against economic growth.

As is often the case, I am more interested in whether the data will give me specific investment ideas. Therefore, I like to look into the industry PPI data for a sense of which industries may be gaining or losing pricing power relative to market perceptions.

For example, the housing slowdown means sawmills are gathering dust. Pricing power is plummeting.

sawmillppi.gif

Yet the stock price for industry leader Weyerhaeuser (WY) is fairly strong.

wy.gif

Yes, I know that institutional investors are clamoring for timberlands.  So perhaps private equity would make a play for WY. But then again, perhaps they wouldn’t - and with all the buying that’s been going on lately I wonder who is left to buy.

Think gasoline prices are high? Actually, refinery pricing has been far lower than normal the last year. The bad news (for drivers) is that it seems to be rebounding.

refineryppi.gif

A chart of Valero (VLO)  suggests the PPI may have some explanatory power. Note the stock dip late last year when PPI plunged, and the subsequent rally as pricing recovered.
vlo.gif

I’m sticking with these two for today, as I’ve written about many of the other opportunities in prior months.

Topics: Valero Energy (VLO), Weyerhaeuser (WY), Stock Market, Economy | 1 Comment
ss_blog_claim=382a98eb3e108cf5651dfbd8aacf661d